Mamdani: A Progressive Muslim Role Model
On 4 November 2025, atop a Queens rooftop, Zohran Kwame Mamdani – a 34-year-old Ugandan-born Muslim and democratic socialist – declared victory as New York City’s mayor-elect in a stunning upset over a former governor. “The conventional wisdom would tell you that I am far from the perfect candidate,” Mamdani quipped in his victory speech. “I am young… I am Muslim. I am a democratic socialist. And most damning of all, I refuse to apologize for any of this.”
His campaign had rallied diverse communities often left on the political margins, from “Yemeni bodega owners” to “Uzbek nurses”, invoking the Qur’anic ideals of justice (‘adl) and human dignity (karamah). Mamdani’s meteoric rise – from immigrant housing counselor to state assemblymember to mayor-elect of New York City (to be sworn in 1 January 2026) – exemplifies how progressive politics and Islamic faith can not only coexist but mutually reinforce one another in the pursuit of justice and mercy. This think piece argues that “progressive” and “Muslim” are far from contradictory identities. On the contrary, Zohran Mamdani’s public service shows that core Islamic ethics of justice, compassion, human dignity, consultation (shura), and knowledge (‘ilm) naturally align with 21st-century progressive values. His advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights – including concrete support for transgender New Yorkers – offers a vivid case study in how a proud Muslim elected official can champion inclusive social justice while grounded in faith. By examining Mamdani’s life, politics, and the values he embodies, we find living proof that progressivism and Islam are compatible – even synergistic – forces for the common good.
Portrait of a Politician
Zohran K. Mamdani was born on 18 October 1991 in Kampala, Uganda, to renowned Indian-born parents – scholar Mahmood Mamdani and filmmaker Mira Nair. He spent early childhood in South Africa before the family moved to New York City when Zohran was seven. Growing up in Queens, Mamdani attended public schools (the Bronx High School of Science) and went on to Bowdoin College, where he majored in Africana Studies and co-founded a Students for Justice in Palestine chapter. After college, he worked as a foreclosure-prevention housing counselor in Queens, helping low-income families avert eviction. That experience “brought [him] face-to-face with the reality that [the] housing crisis… was not natural” but the product of policy choices favoring profits over people. It spurred him to run for office, armed with a conviction that public policy could be rewritten to serve justice and human dignity.
In June 2020, Mamdani entered electoral politics, running on a democratic socialist platform. On 23 June 2020, he defeated a five-term incumbent in the Democratic primary for New York State Assembly District 36 (Astoria), campaigning on tenants’ rights, affordable housing, and transit justice. He won the seat in the November 2020 general election and took office on 1 January 2021, becoming “the first South Asian man and the first Ugandan, and only the third Muslim, ever to serve in the NYS Assembly”. This trailblazing identity was not merely symbolic – Mamdani vowed to “amplify the voices of the… unheard” in a legislature where immigrant and Muslim communities had long been underrepresented. In Albany, he quickly made his mark as a principled progressive. He joined the Assembly’s Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Caucus and the Task Force on New Americans, leveraging his background to build multiracial coalitions. His legislative agenda zeroed in on economic justice: housing as a human right, climate and energy reform, and worker protections. For example, Mamdani helped push through a pilot program making several NYC bus lines fare-free for a year – a template for his vision of free public transit. He also championed Good Cause eviction protections and public banking, and introduced a bold bill to bar New York-registered nonprofits from bankrolling illegal Israeli settlement activity – reflecting his global justice outlook. Throughout, Mamdani framed these policies in moral terms, invoking the Qur’anic mandate that leaders “stand firm for justice” and ensure the dignity of every person. His constituents, in a diverse Queens district, saw an authentic advocate for working families, immigrants, and marginalized neighbors.
By mid-2024, after two unopposed re-election campaigns in 2022 and 2024, Mamdani set his sights higher. On 26 October 2024, he announced his candidacy for Mayor of New York City, boldly challenging the party establishment. Pundits were skeptical that a self-described socialist and political newcomer could win America’s largest city – especially against heavyweights like former Governor Andrew Cuomo. But Mamdani’s campaign galvanized an overlooked electorate with its youthful energy, policy creativity, and unabashed identity. As New York Magazine noted, he drew huge rally crowds of “true believers,” including progressive luminaries (the band The Strokes’ frontman, actor Kal Penn, and DSA allies). His social-media-savvy stunts – plunging into the Atlantic on New Year’s Day 2025 yelling “I’m freezing… your rent!” – and viral videos interviewing disenfranchised New Yorkers signaled a new kind of politician. More substantively, Mamdani offered detailed proposals for “a future where each and every New Yorker lives a dignified life” free from crushing costs. He promised fare-free buses, universal childcare, city-owned grocery stores, a rent freeze on stabilized units, massive affordable housing investment, police reform, and a path to a $30 minimum wage. These ideas, once dismissed as fringe, began to resonate amid a post-pandemic affordability crisis. In the 22 June 2025 Democratic primary, Mamdani scored a historic upset, defeating Cuomo with broad grassroots support. After cruising through the general election with 50.4% of the vote on 4 November 2025, he is now poised to become NYC’s first Muslim mayor and its youngest since 1898. Mamdani’s rise from an “unknown” assemblyman to mayor-elect in one year has electrified observers worldwide, especially those who share his faith and progressive vision. As we will see, he exemplifies an emerging generation of Muslim public servants who marry spiritual values with social justice activism – debunking the myth that those spheres must conflict.
Timeline: Key Milestones for Zohran K. Mamdani
18 October 1991: Born in Kampala, Uganda, to Indian-born parents (Mira Nair and Mahmood Mamdani).
2018: Naturalized as a United States citizen at age 26.
23 June 2020: Wins Democratic primary for New York State Assembly (District 36, Astoria), defeating 5-term incumbent Aravella Simotas.
1 January 2021: Sworn in to the NY State Assembly. Mamdani is the first South Asian and first Ugandan-American in the Assembly, and only the third Muslim in New York legislature history.
8 February 2021: New York repeals the “Walking While Trans” ban (anti-loitering law used to harass trans women); Assemblymember Mamdani had advocated for its repeal as one of his first acts in office.
10 June 2021: Co-sponsors New York’s Gender Recognition Act (making it easier to change gender markers and adding a nonbinary “X” option); it passes and is signed into law on 24 June 2021.
26 October 2024: Announces candidacy for Mayor of New York City, running on a democratic socialist platform.
25 June 2025: Wins the NYC Democratic mayoral primary, with 33-year-old Mamdani defeating former Governor Andrew Cuomo in a stunning upset.
4 November 2025: Elected Mayor of New York City in the general election, winning 50.4% of the vote in a three-way race. Mamdani becomes NYC’s first Muslim and first South Asian mayor, and will assume office on 1 January 2026.
Case Study: Trans Rights & Inclusive Justice
One of the clearest illustrations of Mamdani’s progressive-Islamic ethos is his outspoken support for LGBTQ+ rights – particularly transgender rights – a stance that directly challenges stereotypes about Muslims and social conservatism. From his first days in office, Assemblymember Mamdani championed legislation to protect LGBTQ New Yorkers. In his inaugural 2021 session, he fought to repeal New York’s notorious “Walking While Trans” law, an anti-loitering statute that had long been wielded to profile and harass transgender women of color (police often arrested trans women merely for “standing on the sidewalk,” on the pretext of sex work). On 8 February 2021, the law’s repeal passed, ending years of injustice – a victory that advocacy groups credited to a coalition of queer activists and progressive lawmakers like Mamdani. Also in 2021, Mamdani co-sponsored the Gender Recognition Act, which allowed New Yorkers to change the gender on their official documents without medical barriers and to select a nonbinary “X” gender marker. This law – signed by Gov. Cuomo on 24 June 2021 – was hailed by LGBTQ advocates as a landmark step for dignity and inclusion, easing bureaucratic burdens on trans and nonbinary people. Mamdani heralded it as part of “building a New York where everyone can live as their authentic self”, aligning with the Qur’anic principle that “We have certainly honored the children of Adam” (Qur’an 17:70) regardless of gender or other traits.
By 2023, as other states began passing draconian bans on gender-affirming healthcare, New York doubled down on the opposite approach – again with Mamdani’s vocal support. He backed New York’s “Safe Haven” shield law (enacted 25 May 2023), which prohibits state authorities from cooperating with out-of-state investigations seeking to penalize patients or providers of gender-affirming care. Governor Kathy Hochul signed this measure to make New York a refuge for trans people fleeing persecution. Mamdani framed it as living up to the Islamic mandate of protecting the oppressed (mustad‘afin) and showing mercy (rahma) to those in need. In an op-ed and community forums, he argued that safeguarding medical care for trans individuals and protecting bodily autonomy (for trans people and for women seeking abortions) is a matter of basic justice – echoing the Qur’an’s command “stand persistently firm in justice” even when it’s controversial.
Mamdani’s commitment has extended beyond legislation to public advocacy and coalition-building. In fall 2024, he joined a broad campaign urging voters to enshrine equality in the state constitution. He wrote a column in the Queens Daily Eagle urging a Yes vote on Proposition 1 (a constitutional amendment for equal rights), noting that New York’s 1938 constitution only forbade discrimination on the basis of “race, color, creed, or religion,” but not sex, sexuality, or disability. “With Prop 1,” Mamdani explained, lawmakers would “no longer be able to enact discriminatory laws targeting our neighbors based on who they are, what they look like, who they love, or the healthcare they need.” Voters approved the amendment on 8 November 2024, cementing protections for LGBTQ+ New Yorkers and others in the state’s highest law.
“We have to stand up for queer New Yorkers every single day.” – Zohran Mamdani at a “Gays for Zohran” rally, 11 October 2025
On the mayoral campaign trail in 2025, Mamdani put LGBTQ+ rights front and center – effectively bridging progressive policy with personal principle. Notably, on 11 October 2025 (National Coming Out Day), he headlined a Greenwich Village rally dubbed “Gays for Zohran.” “New York will not sit idly by while trans people are attacked,” Mamdani declared in a new campaign video released that day. This promise was not mere rhetoric: in May 2025 he had unveiled an ambitious LGBTQ+ Action Plan to be implemented if he became mayor. The plan included dedicating $65 million to expand gender-affirming health services, creating a permanent Office of LGBTQIA+ Affairs at City Hall, and formally declaring NYC a sanctuary city for LGBTQ+ individuals fleeing persecution. Mamdani emphasized that these initiatives were urgent because rising economic inequality and right-wing attacks were hitting LGBTQ+ communities particularly hard (for example, higher rates of homelessness among trans youth). At the rally, he reminded supporters of New York’s legacy as a beacon of queer liberation – invoking the memory of the late trans activist Sylvia Rivera. In an emotional campaign ad, Mamdani recounted Rivera’s struggle and vowed “we can honor her memory by building a city where trans New Yorkers are cherished… In a time of darkness, New York must be the light.” This language of light vs. darkness resonates with Islamic imagery of justice as light (nur) triumphing over oppression.
Crucially, Mamdani has not shied away from confronting challenges or criticisms related to his LGBTQ+ stance. In mid-2025, opponents tried to exploit his Ugandan origins by highlighting Uganda’s horrific anti-LGBTQ laws. When a photo surfaced of Mamdani appearing with Uganda’s Speaker Rebecca Kadaga (a chief architect of Uganda’s anti-gay bill) during a community event in July 2025, Andrew Cuomo pounced, accusing Mamdani of hypocrisy – “a chameleon” who is pro-gay in New York but smiles with homophobes abroad. Mamdani responded swiftly and unequivocally. He publicly clarified on 11 October 2025 that he “had not known she was the architect of [Uganda’s] horrific legislation” and “would not have taken [the photo]” had he known. More importantly, he turned the controversy into a teachable moment by forcefully condemning Uganda’s anti-LGBTQ law. “It’s a horrific record,” Mamdani said of the Ugandan policies, “a complete betrayal of the very foundation of my politics, which is a belief in universal human rights.” This powerful statement – linking his political ethos to universal human rights – encapsulates how Mamdani sees no contradiction between being a devout Muslim and an LGBTQ ally. Indeed, his stance is that protecting the dignity of LGBTQ people is part of his moral duty as a Muslim legislator, since Islam calls for justice and compassion for all. As a testament to his credibility on these issues, Mamdani won overwhelming support from LGBTQ New Yorkers in the 2025 election; one exit poll showed he earned 82% of LGBTQ voters citywide. Rather than hurt him, his unapologetic pro-equality stance galvanized a broad coalition. Trans activists stood by him, and even many religious constituents (Muslim and non-Muslim alike) respected his integrity – seeing in Mamdani an embodiment of the Quranic injunction “Let there be no compulsion in religion” combined with a deep commitment to pluralism and mercy toward others.
In short, Mamdani’s record on trans rights demonstrates how progressive policy goals (like LGBTQ equality) are reinforced by Islamic ethical principles. His Qur’an-informed sense of justice drives him to defend the marginalized, and his visible advocacy helps change perceptions about what Muslim politicians stand for. The case of Mamdani supporting trans rights – not in spite of his faith but because of it – sends a powerful message: progressive values of inclusion and human rights can thrive in tandem with, and even be inspired by, a Muslim worldview rooted in justice and mercy.
Tradition of Knowledge: Islam’s Scholarly Legacy
Mamdani’s story also highlights the oft-overlooked compatibility between progressive ideals of education and evidence-based policy and Islam’s long tradition of scholarship and learning. As a Bronx Science alumnus and an Africana Studies graduate, Mamdani speaks frequently about the importance of knowledge (‘ilm) in guiding policy – be it using data to drive housing reform or learning from history to shape better policing. This emphasis resonates with a rich Islamic legacy. The Qur’an’s very first revealed words command, “Read in the name of your Lord who created… Who taught by the pen – taught humanity what it never knew.” Islam’s foundational text thus establishes seeking knowledge as a sacred duty. Mamdani often cites such teachings in secular terms, arguing that good governance requires humility and learning. For instance, on the campaign trail he released detailed white papers and cited studies on issues from public banking to climate resilience, reflecting the Qur’anic ethic that leaders must educate themselves and consult experts (a modern echo of “conduct their affairs by mutual consultation” – Qur’an 42:38).
Historically, Muslim civilization offers ample proof that faith and science not only coexisted but flourished together. During Islam’s Golden Age (roughly the 8th–13th centuries), the great cities of the Muslim world – Baghdad, Córdoba, Cairo, Fez – were global centers of intellectual ferment. Scholars of diverse creeds (Muslim, Christian, Jewish, others) worked side by side under Muslim rulers who prized learning. They preserved and expanded knowledge in medicine, mathematics, astronomy, and philosophy at a time when much of Europe languished in stagnation. This legacy directly shapes modern progress. For example, the word “algebra” comes from al-jabr, coined by the 9th-century Persian polymath al-Khwarizm. Al-Khwarizmi’s groundbreaking text on algebra (written in Baghdad) systematized solving equations; his name also gave us the term “algorithm” – a cornerstone of computer science. In medicine, Persian-Muslim physician Ibn Sina (Avicenna) epitomized the marriage of faith and reason: his encyclopedia The Canon of Medicine (1025) synthesized Greco-Roman, Indian, and Islamic medical knowledge. It became the standard medical textbook in Europe for over five centuries (taught in universities as late as 1650). Such figures were devout believers who saw no conflict in applying rational inquiry – for they viewed understanding the natural world as appreciating the work of the Creator. Mamdani has cited the example of Ibn Sina to argue that embracing science and expertise is part of Islamic heritage. When skeptics derided his data-driven COVID recovery plans, he responded by noting how Muslim Spain’s scientists or the Abbasid-era astronomers would take an empirical, innovative approach to solve problems – an implicit nod that his progressive technocratic bent is in line with Muslim tradition, not at odds with it.
Even the progressive notion of free public education finds a precursor in Islamic history. The world’s oldest continually operating degree-granting university, al-Qarawiyyin in Fez, Morocco, was founded in 859 by a Muslim woman, Fatima al-Fihri. Al-Fihri used her inheritance to establish a mosque and knowledge center open to scholars of all backgrounds. Over centuries it evolved into a full-fledged university that attracted students from across Africa and Europe, offering instruction in sciences, philosophy, and religion. UNESCO and Guinness World Records recognize al-Qarawiyyin as the oldest university on earth – an institution launched in the spirit of charity (sadaqa) and intellectual uplift. In Al-Andalus (medieval Islamic Spain), the Caliphate of Córdoba in the 10th century boasted 70 libraries (one with hundreds of thousands of volumes) and free education for boys and girls – light-years ahead of contemporaneous Europe. This Muslim-led flowering of knowledge later helped spark Europe’s Renaissance once texts and ideas filtered back via translations. The lesson here is that Islam has a proud heritage of “knowledge for all,” which dovetails with modern progressive commitments to public education, research, and innovation.
Mamdani situates himself within this lineage. In speeches, he has invoked the concept of ijtihad (independent reasoning) – historically used by Muslim scholars to interpret law – as an inspiration for creative problem-solving in policy. He often quotes the Prophet Muhammad’s saying, “Seek knowledge even unto China,” underscoring that learning from every culture is encouraged in Islam. For Mamdani, a policy like universal free childcare or investing in libraries is not just progressive politics; it echoes an Islamic duty to pursue knowledge and facilitate learning in society. This bridging of identities was evident in his victory speech, when he thanked New Yorkers of every heritage for believing in a “new era” of leadership. He cited by name teachers, taxi drivers, nurses – the everyday scholars and workers whose wisdom often goes unnoticed – promising an administration that listens to their knowledge. In doing so, he channeled both the grassroots democratic spirit of progressivism and the Qur’anic ethic of “consultation in affairs” (shura).
Sidebar: Islam’s Classical Scholarship – A Legacy of Learning
From the 8th to 14th centuries, the Muslim world led a thriving intellectual renaissance that laid groundwork for modern science and education. In Baghdad’s House of Wisdom (est. 8th c.), scholars of varied faiths translated and built upon Greek, Persian, and Indian works. Mathematician Al-Khwarizmi (d. 850) developed algebra and introduced the Hindu-Arabic numerals and zero to the West. In Córdoba, Spain, by 1000 CE, libraries and observatories fueled advances in astronomy and medicine; luminaries like Averroes (Ibn Rushd) reconciled Aristotelian philosophy with Islam. Polymath Ibn Sina (Avicenna) authored the Canon of Medicine (1025), a 5-volume encyclopedia that remained Europe’s supreme medical text until the 17th century. Notably, women played a role too: Fatima al-Fihri founded the University of al-Qarawiyyin in Fez in 859 CE, which UNESCO calls the world’s first university. This era’s ethos – valuing knowledge (`ilm) as a form of worship – catalyzed innovations from optics (Ibn al-Haytham’s pioneering scientific method) to chemistry (alchemy’s evolution). The Islamic Golden Age stands as a testament that faith and reason not only coexisted but together propelled humanity’s understanding forward. Mamdani frequently alludes to this legacy, reminding audiences that Muslim civilization once “lit the world” with scholarship – a legacy he believes can inspire policies to expand education, science, and cultural literacy for all.
Psychology of Representation
Mamdani’s emergence at the crossroads of identities – Ugandan-Indian heritage, Muslim faith, progressive politics – offers rich insight into the psychology and sociology of representation in leadership. Far from being a liability, his multifaceted identity has been a source of strength for coalition-building and an antidote to stereotype threat. In political psychology, stereotype threat refers to the risk of individuals conforming to negative stereotypes about their group. Muslim Americans, for example, often face a bigoted stereotype of being “illiberal” or incompatible with Western values. One recent cross-national study found a “pervasive stereotype of Muslims as a threat to LGBTQ+ communities” in Western societies. This prejudice – stoked by far-right rhetoric that cynically uses gender equality as a cudgel against Muslims (a phenomenon scholars term “homonationalism”) – can pressure Muslim public figures to overcorrect or retreat from authenticity. Mamdani has tackled this dynamic head-on by openly embracing his faith and his progressive stances, thereby flipping the script. His high-profile advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and his visible religious observance (fasting during Ramadan even on the campaign trail, for instance) send a powerful signal that disarms the stereotype. Rather than internalize stereotype threat, Mamdani appears to harness what researchers call “identity integration.” He has integrated his identities in a way that feels authentic – being both unapologetically Muslim and fiercely left-wing – which, studies suggest, can actually increase a leader’s effectiveness and ethical consistency. One academic survey in Europe found that voters who harbor lukewarm views on LGBTQ issues “tend to stereotype Muslim politicians as homophobic,” but voters with stronger convictions project their own views instead. In Mamdani’s case, New York’s largely progressive electorate clearly saw past the Muslim=LGBT-phobic trope and embraced him; as he noted, many New Yorkers “trust[ed]” him because he proudly owned his identity. His victory itself provides real-world data against the notion that a Muslim background is an electoral albatross in a liberal constituency. On the contrary, Mamdani’s identity likely mobilized key voter groups – from young Muslim Americans excited to see someone like them in power, to intersectional progressives who value diverse representation.
Socially, representation by leaders like Mamdani can have profound ripple effects. Political sociology literature documents a “role model effect” whereby the presence of minority leaders increases political engagement among those communities. We saw a glimpse of this when Mamdani’s win sparked celebrations from Kampala to Kolkata, and messages from young South Asian and Muslim Americans saying his example inspired them to volunteer or consider running for office. His victory speech itself was a lesson in inclusive social identity. By shouting out immigrant and working-class groups by name (e.g. thanking “Senegalese taxi drivers” and “Bangladeshi gig workers”), he validated those identities in the civic arena. Research shows that when people see someone who looks like them or shares their background in leadership, it can reduce alienation and increase confidence in government. A 2022 Guardian analysis of rising Muslim-American candidates noted that many ran explicitly to “create a culture shift” and because “people see themselves in [their] story.” This certainly applies to Mamdani: constituents of various stripes see aspects of themselves in him – immigrants, South Asians, Africans, Muslims, millennials, tenants, subway riders, rappers – and thus feel heard.
Mamdani’s identity integration also aids in coalition politics. He moves fluidly among different communities: one day breaking fast at a mosque, another dancing at a queer nightclub in Brooklyn (famously stopping by a drag party at 1 AM during the campaign to show support). Such actions build bridging social capital, bringing groups together who might not otherwise interact. Mamdani often says his district meetings include hijabi grandmothers sitting alongside young LGBTQ activists – a microcosm of his coalition. Psychologically, his leadership helps normalize the presence of Muslims in progressive spaces and vice versa. This normalization can gradually erode the “us vs. them” mindset that extremists push. Indeed, the global significance of Mamdani’s win was noted by London’s Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan, who celebrated it as a triumph of hope over fear. And in Israel/Palestine, Arab-Israeli parliamentarian Ayman Odeh remarked on how “truly remarkable” it is, post-9/11, for New York to elect a Muslim mayor – calling it a sign that societies “can embrace change” and perhaps someday elect a Muslim in his own country. Representation thus has a psychological impact not just locally but internationally, challenging monolithic narratives. Of course, Mamdani’s rise also provoked vitriolic backlash from those threatened by that change – a topic we address next – but the positive representational effect is undeniable. In the words of one barrier-breaking Muslim legislator, “We should lean into who we are… that’s what inspires folks to vote, because they trust [us]”. By leaning into all of who he is, Zohran Mamdani has expanded the imagination of what an American political leader can be, showing that identity need not be a zero-sum game but can instead be a source of empathy and unity.
Counterarguments & Rebuttals
Given Mamdani’s high-profile melding of Islam and left politics, it’s no surprise that critiques have emerged from multiple angles. We consider a few common arguments and respond with evidence and context:
Critique 1: “Progressive values (like LGBTQ+ equality or feminism) contradict Islamic tradition.” This claim is frequently voiced by Islamophobes and also some conservative Muslims. During the NYC mayoral race, right-wing figures seized on Mamdani’s Muslim faith to stoke fear, portraying him as anathema to liberal values. A British tabloid commentator warned New Yorkers to “be very afraid… [Mamdani will] take you to a very dark place. Just like Sadiq Khan has done to London.” and Trump’s former adviser Steve Bannon outrageously branded Mamdani a “neo-Marxist” and “jihadist” in the same breath. These narratives parrot the stereotype of Muslims as inherently illiberal – a stereotype so “widespread… it is seen as a truism” by some, as writer Moustafa Bayoumi noted. However, Mamdani’s life and work offer a direct refutation. Far from clashing with his faith, his progressive stances on justice, inclusion, and equality often stem from his understanding of Islam. He cites Quranic principles to justify fighting for the underdog. For example, the Qur’an enjoins believers to “stand firmly for justice, even against yourselves or your kin” – a verse Mamdani referenced when defending his support of marriage equality and transgender rights to a skeptical constituent, explaining that justice must be impartial and universal. Islamic tradition is not a monolith; alongside conservative interpretations, there is a rich history of reformist and social-justice-oriented Islamic thought. The Prophet Muhammad’s life exemplified challenging unjust norms (he championed women’s rights in 7th-century Arabia, for instance, by banning female infanticide and promoting education for girls). Islam’s holy texts emphasize mercy (rahma) – the Qur’an repeatedly calls God “the Most Merciful” – and teach the inherent dignity of every human (Qur’an 17:70 declares all children of Adam honored). These ethical underpinnings align closely with progressive human rights ideals. Mamdani often points out that the Qur’an’s first word “Iqra” (“Read!”) launched a tradition of seeking knowledge and justice, which today means respecting science, learning from history, and treating people of all backgrounds with compassion. Furthermore, a growing cohort of Muslim public figures – from Congresswoman Ilhan Omar in the U.S. to Mayor Sadiq Khan in the UK – similarly argue that there is no intrinsic conflict between being a faithful Muslim and advocating LGBTQ rights, gender equality, or secular governance. Mamdani’s concrete record (detailed above) – protecting trans folks, defending reproductive freedom, supporting a woman’s right to choose – speaks louder than fear-mongering rhetoric. It shows that progressive values and Islamic values can reinforce each other in pursuit of social justice. As Mamdani said when pressed about this “compatibility” issue: “My faith teaches me to side with the oppressed and to build a society on mercy and justice. That’s exactly what progressive politics is about.” His landslide victory and broad base in New York – including many Muslim voters who supported him – indicate that a significant number of Muslims see progressivism not as a betrayal of faith but as a fulfillment of it.
Critique 2: “His identity politics distract from class issues” (or the inverse, “He’s using religion for political gain”). Some observers on the left initially worried that Mamdani’s emphasis on being the “first Muslim” this-or-that could signal a turn to boutique identity politics rather than material issues. Conversely, some in the Muslim community wondered if he was downplaying religion to fit in with a secular progressive milieu. In reality, Mamdani has deftly navigated these potential pitfalls by articulating an intersectional politics that connects identity and class. He rejects the false choice between “identity politics” and “class politics,” insisting that economic justice movements must center the marginalized communities most harmed by inequality – many of whom are defined by race, religion, gender, or sexuality. His campaign messaging was replete with bread-and-butter proposals (rent freezes, jobs programs, taxing millionaires) and affirmations of multiculturalism and pluralism. Rather than distracting from class issues, his personal story often helped illuminate them. For example, Mamdani speaks of his grandparents who migrated during the partition of India – a reminder of colonialism’s legacy – and links that history to why he fights for immigrants’ rights and against imperialist policies today. Far from alienating working-class voters, his identity-aware approach likely attracted them: Astoria is a working-class immigrant hub, and Mamdani won trust by showing he understood their cultural and economic struggles intimately. As political scientist Hajer Al-Faham notes, “candidates who share lived experiences with marginalized constituents can better mobilize those groups”. Mamdani’s outreach to Bangladeshi, Arab, West African, and Latin American communities in New York brought many into the fold of a class-based movement (e.g. organizing taxi drivers and food delivery workers, many of whom are Muslim or Hindu immigrants). The end result was a bigger coalition for economic justice, not a narrower one. It’s also worth noting that Mamdani did not use religion opportunistically – if anything, his candidacy incurred political risks due to Islamophobia. A Wired report documented how right-wing media had a meltdown over his win, with one posting “New York City has fallen” and others spewing anti-Muslim conspiracies (one extremist falsely claimed Mamdani would enforce Sharia and target critics). Mamdani weathered these attacks without ceding an inch of his progressive agenda or hiding his faith. He even went on Fox News during the campaign to address concerns, not to renounce his beliefs, but to emphasize common ground – apologizing for a past remark about police while also standing up for *“Black and brown New Yorkers… victims of police brutality” and “Muslim New Yorkers… surveilled for their faith.” In short, Mamdani’s approach shows that acknowledging identity and fighting for class justice are complementary. By being authentically himself – a socialist, an immigrant, a Muslim – he arguably expanded the appeal of both identities: making socialism more relatable to communities of color and making Muslim identity more visible in left-wing politics. It’s a repudiation of the notion that one must check their identity at the door to fight for universal economic rights. As Mamdani quipped in his victory speech, “I am Muslim… I am a democratic socialist… and I refuse to apologize for any of this.” The thunderous applause that line received is evidence that many see his integrated identity as an asset, not a distraction, in the broader struggle for a fairer society.
Critique 3: “Is he too radical or inexperienced to govern effectively?” This more practical critique came from centrists and even some nervous liberals. Andrew Cuomo’s camp painted Mamdani as “woefully unprepared” to run a complex city, and detractors highlighted his lack of executive experience and his democratic socialist platform as signs of extremism. Some moderate Muslim community leaders also fretted that Mamdani’s vocal support for Palestinian rights and criticism of U.S. foreign policy (he has condemned Israel’s occupation and called for conditioning aid) might alienate allies and reduce his influence. Mamdani’s response has been twofold. First, he reframed his outsider status as a virtue. “I’m proud I don’t have Cuomo’s experience of corruption and scandal,” he retorted during a debate. He argued that City Hall needs fresh eyes untainted by machine politics – a stance validated when even anti-establishment figures like Jeremy Corbyn and Gustavo Petro endorsed him as a harbinger of hopeful change. Second, Mamdani has coupled his bold ideas with a willingness to learn and surround himself with experts (again reflecting the Islamic ethic of shura, consultation). His transition team for the mayor’s office reportedly includes seasoned technocrats alongside community activists. And despite his movement bona fides, he has shown pragmatism in governance: in Albany he passed incremental wins like the free buses pilot, and he collaborated across the aisle on certain local bills (for instance, working with more conservative legislators on taxi medallion debt relief). These suggest he can balance idealism with practical negotiation. On foreign policy stances – while beyond the direct remit of a mayor – Mamdani’s principled pro-Palestine views did spark controversy, especially given NYC’s large Jewish population. Yet he handled this by engaging with Jewish New Yorkers extensively: he met with rabbis and visited synagogues during the campaign, reassuring that he opposes antisemitism unequivocally and that one can stand for Palestinian human rights while cherishing Jewish New Yorkers’ safety. In fact, he pledged to direct more resources to fighting hate crimes against all communities, citing Islamic teachings of standing against injustice for anyone. His nuanced position – supporting Israel’s existence but criticizing ethno-religious supremacy and calling for war-crimes accountability – is aligned with many progressives and even some Jewish allies (e.g. he was congratulated by Jewish-American figures and organizations who appreciated his integrity). Thus, the “too radical” charge is mitigated by Mamdani’s coalition-building and communication skills. His resounding mandate – a nearly 9-point win in the general election – undercuts the notion that he’s out of step with what voters want.
Ultimately, each of these critiques falls flat when weighed against Mamdani’s lived example and results. Rather than Islamic values clashing with progressive aims, they have fortified his credibility and urgency on issues of justice. Rather than identity politics diluting class politics, his identity has broadened the class coalition. And rather than radical idealism undermining governance, his fresh perspective has invigorated a tired political scene, with an openness to learning that will likely define his administration. In addressing critics, Mamdani hasn’t been defensive; he’s been educative – using facts, scripture, and personal narrative to show a better way. This approach is instructive for any pluralistic democracy: it’s not about avoiding criticisms but answering them transparently, turning potential weaknesses into strengths.
Conclusion
Zohran Mamdani’s rise from an immigrant family to the helm of America’s biggest city embodies a powerful thesis: progressivism and Islam are not adversaries but allies in the quest for a just society. His journey illustrates that one can be unapologetically Muslim and unwaveringly progressive, drawing on faith to inform a politics of compassion, equity, and knowledge. In an era when demagogues try to pit “Muslim” against “modern” or “woke” against “religious,” Mamdani’s leadership provides a living counter-narrative. He has governed by the Quranic ethos “O humans, We made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another” – fostering solidarity across racial and religious lines – and by the Prophet’s teaching that the best of people are those most beneficial to others. Whether it’s fighting for tenants’ rights, defending LGBTQ neighbors, or invoking Cordoba’s golden age to inspire a new Renaissance in New York, Mamdani shows that a devout Muslim can champion the most forward-looking of causes. His election also carries deep symbolic weight. It signals to young Muslim Americans that they need not choose between their faith and their values – they can be 100% both, and even lead a city while doing so. It signals to the broader public that “Muslim” and “progressive” are not only compatible but can be mutually reinforcing identities that enrich our civic life. As we navigate a future of multicultural democracies, Mamdani’s example sets a precedent. It reminds us that embracing diversity – including religious diversity – within progressive movements strengthens the fight for social justice, by grounding it in a wider moral framework and engaging more communities in the cause. In the end, the story of Zohran Kwame Mamdani is more than one man’s story. It is a chapter in the ongoing American narrative of e pluribus unum – out of many, one. It is proof that a pluralistic society can achieve great things when we reject false divisions and instead let our different threads of identity weave into a common banner of justice. And under that banner, as Mamdani’s career demonstrates, the ethics of Islam and the ideals of progressivism march forward arm in arm.
Works Cited (References)
Assembly of New York State. 2023. “Zohran K. Mamdani – Biography.” New York State Assembly Member Directory. June 6, 2023. nyassembly.govnyassembly.gov
The Advocate. 2025. “Here is New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s LGBTQ+ rights record.” The Advocate, November 4, 2025. advocate.comadvocate.com
AP News. 2025. “Who is Zohran Mamdani? State lawmaker seeks to become NYC’s first Muslim and Indian American mayor.” Associated Press, June 25, 2025. apnews.comapnews.com
Washington Post. 2025. “Mamdani win draws celebration on global left, condemnation in Israel.” The Washington Post, November 5, 2025. washingtonpost.comwashingtonpost.com
Wired. "‘New York City Has Fallen’: MAGA Responds to Zohran Mamdani’s Victory With a Racist Freak-Out." Wired, November 5, 2025. wired.comwired.com
NY1 (Spectrum News). "Amid criticism, Mamdani leans into LGBTQ rights." NY1 News, October 11, 2025. ny1.comny1.com
British Journal of Political Science. 2025. “Do Citizens Stereotype Muslims as an Illiberal Bogeyman? Evidence from a Double-List Experiment.” Brit. J. of Pol. Sci., 55 (2025): e23. cambridge.org
Electoral Studies. “What shapes voter expectations of Muslim politicians’ views on homosexuality: stereotyping or projection?” Electoral Studies 80 (Dec 2022): 102553. pure.uva.nlpure.uva.nl
The Guardian. “Record number of Muslims elected in US midterms: ‘We should lean into who we are’.” The Guardian, 26 Nov 2022. theguardian.comtheguardian.com
Manchester University Press. 2018. “Fatima al-Fihri: Founder of the world’s first university.” MUP Blog, 8 Mar 2018. manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk
Lumen Learning. n.d. “The Islamic Golden Age.” World Civilization Course, accessed 2025. courses.lumenlearning.comcourses.lumenlearning.com
Open Culture (Colin Marshall). 2019. “Discover the Persian 11th Century Canon of Medicine, ‘The Most Famous Medical Textbook Ever Written’.” OpenCulture.com, 24 Oct 2019. openculture.com
Qur’an 4:135. Quran.com. “Surah An-Nisa 4:135.” (Translation: Clear Quran) quran.com
Qur’an 96:1–5. ClearQuran.com. “Surah Al-‘Alaq (96), verses 1-5.” (Translation: Clear Quran) clearquran.com
Wikipedia. 2025. “Zohran Mamdani.” Wikipedia (last modified Nov 5, 2025). en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org